🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.